Nature’s Gift profile

Nature’s Gift · PRODUCT EVIDENCE

Sandalwood, Australian

Botanical name not captured · Source checked Sep 6, 11:50 PM UTC

What the supplier lists

Captured product claims; report identity is shown separately below.

Product source ↗
Origin
Not captured
Plant part
Not captured
Extraction method
Not captured
Chemotype
Not captured
Read supplier product description

There has been much controversy about “Australian Sandalwood” for as long as I have been involved with essential oils. Some, mostly the Australian producers, say that it is a sustainable crop. Other experts say no, that the plantations are not successful and the trees are not growing well, that it is not a sustainable crop. Others say that solvent extraction, as well as distillation, is used in the process. And, frankly, it has never struck me as an acceptable aromatic substitute for true Indian Sandalwood. However, my Australian colleagues have long stressed the potent anti-bacterial and anti-inflammatory effects of Santalum spicatum. For years I’ve ignored this evidence, but I’ve been reading the research studies showing that Australian Sandalwood Oil is effective against a broad range of gram positive and negative bacteria, including strep and staph, as well as being effective against candida. In fact, according to Mark Webb, Australian Sandalwood has proven more effective than Tea Tree against staph, and at least as effective as Tea Tree in battling candida. The oil’s high farnesol content has shown it to be useful against acne, as well as the fungi causing ringworm and athlete’s foot. I see it being a skin care oil for the men in your life; and am thinking how useful it would be added to our Organic Liquid Castile or Shower Gel. Couple the above information with a more aromatically pleasing specimen than we’ve received in the past, and voila! Available pure and undiluted here, and in a 10% Dilution in Fractionated Coconut Oil. SHELF LIFE: Approximately 5 to 8 years after you open the bottle. Storing in the dark, refrigerated, and decanting half full bottles into smaller, full bottles will extend shelf life. Certificate of Analysis: Batch No. AU-HG-37 Batch No. AU-HG-50 Batch No. AU-59057 Santalum spicatum, ethically farmed, steam-distilled from heartwood, Australia. – anti-bacterial – effective against a broad range of gram positive and negative bacteria – skin care oil for men

Size / optionSKUSupplier's listed priceAvailabilityProduct link
From price; choose size on supplier sitef9ca2fe9f872c72fe19017db68ded8fcUSD 23.00in stockBuy this option ↗
Prices retain their published currency. Shipping and tax may be additional.Confirm availability and batch with the supplier.

LEARN AS YOU COMPARE

What’s inside this oil?

Constituents are the natural chemicals that give an oil its character. See the main ones, learn what they do, and explore differences between batches.

I’m interested in

Meet the main constituents, then select one to see what makes it interesting.

Finding the matching oil reports…

Report links found on the supplier source

Follow the original source to inspect the complete report. Link discovery alone does not validate the report or current stock.

Notes on the captured information

Details to keep in mind when using this listing.

  • Product name is a browsing group; botanical identity must be verified before chemical comparison.

AUTOMATIC OIL REVIEW

More evidence needed for this report

What the evidence tells you

3 reports connected; 3 directly linked by the supplier. Read the evidence before comparing chemistry.

Review these findings
Documented

3 source documents archived

The downloaded source document is preserved with its content fingerprint, so later changes do not overwrite the evidence. Archiving alone does not establish its report type or quantitative validity.

Documented

Report linked from the product page

The supplier connects this product to the report. Confirm the batch on the bottle before applying these figures to a purchase.

Evidence gap

Original analytical report status needs confirmation

These source documents are saved, but their status as original laboratory reports is unconfirmed or they are publisher summaries. They remain outside historical anomaly conclusions.

Evidence gap

Chemical extraction needs review

Automatically extracted figures are visible for inspection. They are excluded from historical anomaly conclusions until the extraction is reviewed.

Evidence gap

Comparison context is incomplete

Missing or unconfirmed: botanical name, plant part, extraction method, origin, analysis method, batch, exact analysis date, percentage basis. Unknown values are not assumed to match known values.

Evidence gap

Numerical comparison is not supported for this report

The source extraction identifies mixed or multiple assays. A single comparable measurement series has not been established.

Evidence gap

Repeated constituent identity needs checking

More than one extracted row identifies the same constituent. Its percentage is withheld from the comparison until the source rows are resolved.

Investigate

Extracted percentages exceed 100%

The quantified total is 172.27%. Check for repeated peaks, mixed tables, or a transcription problem before using these values.

Evidence gap

Source extraction has review notes

Multiple assay columns or mixed tables require separate review. The source includes reproduction restrictions; the archived original remains private.

Evidence gap

Source extraction has review notes

Some source peak rows could not be fully verified or quantified. The percentage measurement basis requires confirmation. Additional source extraction notes require review against the original document.

Evidence gap

Numerical comparison is not supported for this report

The source describes the analysis as qualitative. Its listed figures remain visible, but are excluded from numerical historical anomaly conclusions.

Evidence gap

Repeated constituent identity needs checking

More than one extracted row identifies the same constituent. Its percentage is withheld from the comparison until the source rows are resolved.

Evidence gap

Source extraction has review notes

The source describes a qualitative GC/MS analysis; these figures are not validated mass fractions. The source includes reproduction restrictions; the archived original remains private. Additional source extraction notes require review against the original document.

Evidence gap

Not enough comparable history to assess differences

A range requires at least three earlier, reviewed original reports with the same botanical, chemotype, origin, plant part, extraction, analysis method, percentage basis and storage context. Missing and trace values are never replaced with zero.

Read the reported chemistry

Keep the original report, its identity, and the historical sample size in view.

Supplier / batch
Nature’s Gift
Batch not reported
Report botanical identity
Not reported
Chemotype not reported
Origin / plant part
Origin not reported
Plant part not reported
Extraction / analysis
Extraction not reported
Method not reported · area percent
Source document archivedLinked from this productAnalysis: Date not reported
Read original source ↗
Chemical constituentThis reportMatched historical rangeWhat it means
cis-alpha-Santalol30.17%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
cis-alpha-Santalol 1668.0030.17%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
cis-beta-Santalol14.17%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
cis-beta-Santalol 1713.7514.17%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
alpha-SantaleneCAS 512-61-85.81%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
alpha-Santalene 1426.505.81%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
beta-BisabololCAS 15352-77-95.11%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
beta-Bisabolol 1666.255.11%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
beta-SantaleneCAS 511-59-14.68%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
beta-Santalene 1464.004.68%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
beta-Curcumene3.24%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
beta-Curcumene 1512.003.24%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
(Z)-trans-alpha-Bergamotol3.23%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
(Z)-trans-alpha-Bergamotol 1684.203.23%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
epi-beta-SantaleneCAS 25532-78-93.00%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
epi-beta-Santalene 1450.253.00%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
Dendrolasin2.96%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
Dendrolasin 1573.352.96%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
(E)-Nerolidol2.87%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
(E)-Nerolidol 1567.002.87%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
gamma-CurcumeneCAS 28976-68-31.95%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
gamma-Curcumene 1476.001.95%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
trans-alpha-BergamoteneCAS 13474-59-41.90%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
trans-alpha-Bergamotene 1435.001.90%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
beta-Acoradiene 1475.001.75%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
alpha-Selinene 1492.501.37%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
epi-alpha-Bisabolol 1684.861.27%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
Khusilal 1653.001.18%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
cis-alpha-Bergamotene 1411.500.94%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
(Z)-beta-Curcumen-12-ol 1754.000.79%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
ar-Curcumene 1480.500.56%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
cis-Lanceol 1765.000.52%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
Sesquicineole 1515.200.50%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
alpha-Bisabolol 1684.430.47%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
beta-Selinene 1487.570.46%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
Santene 884.00 Normonoterpene0.45%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
Humulene epoxide II 1606.430.45%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
(E,E)-Farnesol 1742.600.41%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
(E)-Nuciferol 1755.000.37%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
(Z)-epi-beta-Santalol 1697.230.33%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
trans-alpha-Santalol 1695.000.28%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
alpha-Cedrene 1410.750.22%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
alpha-Santalal 1335.230.20%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
beta-Cedrene 1428.000.19%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
alpha-Acoradiene 1463.000.18%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
Himachalol 1648.500.18%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
beta-Elemene 1389.200.13%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
alpha-Acorenol 1629.500.10%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
trans-gamma-Bisabolene 1535.650.08%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
Santalone 1177.250.05%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
Tricyclene 923.000.02%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
Citronellol 1229.250.02%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
UK SandalwoodNot quantifiedNo comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
55 measurements in this report · 53 shownObserved history is not a specification or a purity test.

Source changes

New listings, prices, and batch evidence.

  • Sandalwood, Australian

    Analytical document archived; extraction awaits review.

    View source ↗
  • Sandalwood, Australian

    Product first observed in the supplier catalog.

    View source ↗

Know what the evidence says

Three signals. No mystery scores.

Documented evidence

Source documents or comparable measurements support the specific finding shown.

Worth investigating

A chemistry difference or identity mismatch needs context. Open the report and matched history.

Evidence gap

A report, batch link, or key detail is missing. The oil's quality cannot be judged from missing information.