Nature’s Gift · PRODUCT EVIDENCE
Sandalwood, Tamil, 2018
Botanical name not captured · Source checked Sep 6, 11:12 PM UTC
What the supplier lists
Captured product claims; report identity is shown separately below.
Read supplier product description
This is one of the most impressive batches of Tamil Nadu Sandalwood that we have seen in over a decade. And only a few mls are left. Buy it now, or regret it forever. We are unable to restock true Indian Sandalwood and recommend our New Caledonian as a substitute. After trying Santalum album grown in multiple areas…they just didn’t resonate with us. So of course we didn’t bring any in. So this may be the last true Santalum album we will be able to offer you. GC/MS: Batch #IN-58773 Santalum album, wildcrafted, hydrodistilled heartwood, Tamil Nadu, India 2018. – anti-bacterial – effective against a broad range of gram positive and negative bacteria – skin care oil for men
| Size / option | SKU | Supplier's listed price | Availability | Product link |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| From price; choose size on supplier site | 18074-02ml | USD 67.50 | in stock | Buy this option ↗ |
LEARN AS YOU COMPARE
What’s inside this oil?
Constituents are the natural chemicals that give an oil its character. See the main ones, learn what they do, and explore differences between batches.
Meet the main constituents, then select one to see what makes it interesting.
Report links found on the supplier source
Follow the original source to inspect the complete report. Link discovery alone does not validate the report or current stock.
- GC/MS: Batch #IN-58773Batch not specified on linkRead source ↗
Notes on the captured information
Details to keep in mind when using this listing.
- Product name is a browsing group; botanical identity must be verified before chemical comparison.
AUTOMATIC OIL REVIEW
More evidence needed for this report
What the evidence tells you
1 report connected; 1 directly linked by the supplier. Read the evidence before comparing chemistry.
1 source document archived
The downloaded source document is preserved with its content fingerprint, so later changes do not overwrite the evidence. Archiving alone does not establish its report type or quantitative validity.
Report linked from the product page
The supplier connects this product to the report. Confirm the batch on the bottle before applying these figures to a purchase.
Original analytical report status needs confirmation
These source documents are saved, but their status as original laboratory reports is unconfirmed or they are publisher summaries. They remain outside historical anomaly conclusions.
Chemical extraction needs review
Automatically extracted figures are visible for inspection. They are excluded from historical anomaly conclusions until the extraction is reviewed.
Comparison context is incomplete
Missing or unconfirmed: botanical name, plant part, extraction method, origin, analysis method, batch, exact analysis date. Unknown values are not assumed to match known values.
Numerical comparison is not supported for this report
The source extraction identifies mixed or multiple assays. A single comparable measurement series has not been established.
Repeated constituent identity needs checking
More than one extracted row identifies the same constituent. Its percentage is withheld from the comparison until the source rows are resolved.
Extracted percentages exceed 100%
The quantified total is 187.01%. Check for repeated peaks, mixed tables, or a transcription problem before using these values.
Source extraction has review notes
Multiple assay columns or mixed tables require separate review. The source includes reproduction restrictions; the archived original remains private.
Not enough comparable history to assess differences
A range requires at least three earlier, reviewed original reports with the same botanical, chemotype, origin, plant part, extraction, analysis method, percentage basis and storage context. Missing and trace values are never replaced with zero.
Read the reported chemistry
Keep the original report, its identity, and the historical sample size in view.
| Chemical constituent | This report | Matched historical range | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| cis-alpha-Santalol | 49.45% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| cis-alpha-Santalol 1668.00 | 49.45% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| cis-beta-Santalol | 20.65% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| cis-beta-Santalol 1713.75 | 20.65% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| beta-SantaleneCAS 511-59-1 | 4.02% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| beta-Santalene 1464.00 | 4.02% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| (Z)-trans-alpha-Bergamotol | 3.11% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| (Z)-trans-alpha-Bergamotol 1684.20 | 3.11% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| alpha-SantaleneCAS 512-61-8 | 2.80% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| alpha-Santalene 1426.50 | 2.80% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| epi-beta-SantaleneCAS 25532-78-9 | 2.76% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| epi-beta-Santalene 1450.25 | 2.76% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| Khusilal | 2.05% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| Khusilal 1653.00 | 2.05% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| beta-BisabololCAS 15352-77-9 | 1.60% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| beta-Bisabolol 1666.25 | 1.60% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| epi-beta-bisabolol | 1.15% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| epi-beta-bisabolol 1678.50 | 1.15% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| (Z)-NuciferolCAS 122442-36-8 | 0.67% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| (Z)-Nuciferol 1724.50 | 0.67% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| (E)-Nuciferol 1755.00 | 0.64% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| beta-Bisabolene 1509.86 | 0.63% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| trans-alpha-Bergamotene 1435.00 | 0.55% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| ar-Curcumene 1480.50 | 0.53% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| (Z)-epi-beta-Santalol 1697.23 | 0.53% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| alpha-Acorenol 1629.50 | 0.27% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| alpha-Santalal 1335.23 | 0.23% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| Teresantalol 1579.30 | 0.21% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| trans-beta-Santalol 1718.00 | 0.19% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| beta-Acoradiene 1475.00 | 0.12% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| gamma-Curcumene 1476.00 | 0.12% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| cis-Lanceol 1765.00 | 0.12% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| beta-Curcumene 1512.00 | 0.06% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| Santene 884.00 Normonoterpene | 0.03% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| 7-epi-Sesquithujene 1398.10 | 0.03% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| cis-alpha-Bergamotene 1411.50 | 0.03% | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
| UK Sandalwood | Not quantified | No comparable range0 matched historical reports | Context not comparable |
Source changes
New listings, prices, and batch evidence.
- Sandalwood, Tamil, 2018
Analytical document archived; extraction awaits review.
View source ↗ - Sandalwood, Tamil, 2018
Product first observed in the supplier catalog.
View source ↗
Know what the evidence says
Three signals. No mystery scores.
Source documents or comparable measurements support the specific finding shown.
A chemistry difference or identity mismatch needs context. Open the report and matched history.
A report, batch link, or key detail is missing. The oil's quality cannot be judged from missing information.