Nature’s Gift profile

Nature’s Gift · PRODUCT EVIDENCE

Corn Mint

Botanical name not captured · Source checked Sep 7, 12:35 AM UTC

What the supplier lists

Captured product claims; report identity is shown separately below.

Product source ↗
Origin
Not captured
Plant part
Not captured
Extraction method
Not captured
Chemotype
Not captured
Read supplier product description

BRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRR. This ultra high menthol mint variety even SMELLS cold. If you are seeking the “coldest” mint oil you can find, for easing sinus congestion or for a chilling pain relief blend I would consider this bargain-priced ancestor of our more familiar peppermint oils. Our Midwestern Peppermint has just over 40% Menthol. Our Organic Hungarian Peppermint has about 52% and this Corn Mint weighs in at an amazing 75%! At cool room temperature, the menthol will solidify. A few minutes in a warm pocket or a cup of warm water will easily reliquefy the contents. This intense mint will blend with any of the oils that normally blend well with peppermint, however if your goal is scent balance, you will want to use much less. This is an assertive oil that WILL move in and take over. SAFETY: Not for topical use or diffusion around children six and under. I would limit exposure by all avenues, even inhalation. Certificate of Analysis: Batch No. NE-26850 Batch No. NE-58635 Mentha arvensis, steam-distilled ethically farmed leaves, fair trade from the mountains of Nepal •Not for use age 6 and under •Our “MINTIEST” Mint ever! •Chilly and very high in menthol •For cool pain relief or easing sinus congestion •Use for brief periods

Size / optionSKUSupplier's listed priceAvailabilityProduct link
From price; choose size on supplier site938d9c5e6508dd01fd0c63640ff2c68eUSD 10.00in stockBuy this option ↗
Prices retain their published currency. Shipping and tax may be additional.Confirm availability and batch with the supplier.

LEARN AS YOU COMPARE

What’s inside this oil?

Constituents are the natural chemicals that give an oil its character. See the main ones, learn what they do, and explore differences between batches.

I’m interested in

Meet the main constituents, then select one to see what makes it interesting.

Finding the matching oil reports…

Report links found on the supplier source

Follow the original source to inspect the complete report. Link discovery alone does not validate the report or current stock.

Notes on the captured information

Details to keep in mind when using this listing.

  • Product name is a browsing group; botanical identity must be verified before chemical comparison.

AUTOMATIC OIL REVIEW

More evidence needed for this report

What the evidence tells you

2 reports connected; 2 directly linked by the supplier. Read the evidence before comparing chemistry.

Review these findings
Documented

2 source documents archived

The downloaded source document is preserved with its content fingerprint, so later changes do not overwrite the evidence. Archiving alone does not establish its report type or quantitative validity.

Documented

Report linked from the product page

The supplier connects this product to the report. Confirm the batch on the bottle before applying these figures to a purchase.

Evidence gap

Original analytical report status needs confirmation

These source documents are saved, but their status as original laboratory reports is unconfirmed or they are publisher summaries. They remain outside historical anomaly conclusions.

Evidence gap

Chemical extraction needs review

Automatically extracted figures are visible for inspection. They are excluded from historical anomaly conclusions until the extraction is reviewed.

Evidence gap

Comparison context is incomplete

Missing or unconfirmed: plant part, extraction method, origin, analysis method, batch, exact analysis date. Unknown values are not assumed to match known values.

Evidence gap

Numerical comparison is not supported for this report

The source extraction identifies mixed or multiple assays. A single comparable measurement series has not been established.

Evidence gap

Repeated constituent identity needs checking

More than one extracted row identifies the same constituent. Its percentage is withheld from the comparison until the source rows are resolved.

Investigate

Extracted percentages exceed 100%

The quantified total is 215.12%. Check for repeated peaks, mixed tables, or a transcription problem before using these values.

Evidence gap

Source extraction has review notes

Multiple assay columns or mixed tables require separate review. The source includes reproduction restrictions; the archived original remains private. Additional source extraction notes require review against the original document.

Evidence gap

Numerical comparison is not supported for this report

The source extraction identifies mixed or multiple assays. A single comparable measurement series has not been established.

Investigate

Extracted percentages exceed 100%

The quantified total is 196.79%. Check for repeated peaks, mixed tables, or a transcription problem before using these values.

Evidence gap

Source extraction has review notes

Some source peak rows could not be fully verified or quantified. Multiple assay columns or mixed tables require separate review. The source includes reproduction restrictions; the archived original remains private. Some source peaks overlap or combine constituents; independent percentages may not be available. Additional source extraction notes require review against the original document.

Evidence gap

Not enough comparable history to assess differences

A range requires at least three earlier, reviewed original reports with the same botanical, chemotype, origin, plant part, extraction, analysis method, percentage basis and storage context. Missing and trace values are never replaced with zero.

Read the reported chemistry

Keep the original report, its identity, and the historical sample size in view.

Supplier / batch
Nature’s Gift
Batch not reported
Report botanical identity
Mentha arvensis
Chemotype not reported
Origin / plant part
Origin not reported
Plant part not reported
Extraction / analysis
Extraction not reported
Method not reported · area percent
Source document archivedLinked from this productAnalysis: Date not reported
Read original source ↗
Chemical constituentThis reportMatched historical rangeWhat it means
MentholCAS 89-78-186.80%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
Menthol 1177.4086.80%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
RT: 7.10 -19.20%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
MenthoneCAS 89-80-57.32%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
Menthone 1159.437.32%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
IsomenthoneCAS 491-07-61.63%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
Isomenthone 1164.331.63%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
NeomentholCAS 491-01-00.73%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
Neomenthol 1165.000.73%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
para-Cymene 1025.710.47%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
Menthyl acetate 1297.000.36%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
Limonene 1032.000.35%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
p-Cymen-8-ol 1186.430.21%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
Isopulegol 1155.000.19%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
Pulegone 1244.430.18%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
Piperitone 1259.600.14%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
beta-Pinene 979.000.10%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
alpha-Terpineol 1191.710.10%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
alpha-Pinene 940.000.08%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
beta-Caryophyllene 1427.140.08%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
beta-Bourbonene 1388.700.07%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
alpha-Bourbonene 1375.200.05%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
Sabinene 975.710.04%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
3-Octanol 994.670.04%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
trans-Sabinene hydrate 1072.140.04%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
Linalool 1101.140.04%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
1-Octenyl-3 acetate 1113.750.04%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
cis-Linoleic acid 1306.500.04%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
trans-Linoleic acid 1305.500.04%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
beta-Gurjunene 1431.710.04%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
alpha-Caryophyllene 1454.000.04%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
(E)-beta-Farnesene 1456.290.04%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
1,8-Cineole 1033.290.03%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
beta-Phellandrene 1033.570.03%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
alpha-Himachalene 1448.400.03%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
Germacrene D 1484.710.03%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
Caryophyllene oxide 1594.860.02%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
delta-Selinene 1494.000.00%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
delta-Cadinene 1524.140.00%No comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
gamma-Elemene 1491.25Not quantifiedNo comparable range0 matched historical reportsContext not comparable
41 measurements in this report · 40 shownObserved history is not a specification or a purity test.

Source changes

New listings, prices, and batch evidence.

  • Corn Mint

    Analytical document archived; extraction awaits review.

    View source ↗
  • Corn Mint

    Product first observed in the supplier catalog.

    View source ↗

Know what the evidence says

Three signals. No mystery scores.

Documented evidence

Source documents or comparable measurements support the specific finding shown.

Worth investigating

A chemistry difference or identity mismatch needs context. Open the report and matched history.

Evidence gap

A report, batch link, or key detail is missing. The oil's quality cannot be judged from missing information.